Comparison

Rosé Cotes de Provence - Fleurs de Prairie vs Nestea forest

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRosé Cotes de Provence - Fle...Nestea forest
Nutri-Score — b
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 17 kcal 19 kcal
Fat 1 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0 g
Sugars 3 g 4.5 g
Salt 1 g 0 g
Protein 1 g 0.5 g
Additives02
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Nestea forest has 50% less fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Nestea forest has no saturated fat, while Rosé Cotes de Provence - Fleurs de Prairie has 1 g.
  • Rosé Cotes de Provence - Fleurs de Prairie has 33% less sugar (3 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Nestea forest has 97% less salt (0 g vs 1 g).
  • Rosé Cotes de Provence - Fleurs de Prairie has 50% more protein (1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Rosé Cotes de Provence - Fleurs de Prairie is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Rosé Cotes de Provence - Fleurs de Prairie lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Rosé Cotes de Provence - Fleurs de Prairie

Contains SULPHITES

Nestea forest

NESвода, захар, фруктоза, регулатор на киселинността: лимонена киселина, ябълчена киселина и натриеви цитрати, сок от концентрат от: малина (0,1%), арония (0,1%), и касис (0,1%), екстракт от черен чай (0,09%). естествени ароматизанти от червени плодове и други естествени ароматизанти, подсладител: стевиол гликозиди от стевия.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rosé Cotes de Provence - Fleurs de Prairie or Nestea forest?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rosé Cotes de Provence - Fleurs de Prairie has fewer calories: 17 kcal versus 19 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rosé Cotes de Provence - Fleurs de Prairie has less sugar: 3 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons