Oeil de Perdrix vs Nestea forest
Overall, Oeil de Perdrix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Oeil de Perdrix | Nestea forest |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 76 kcal | 19 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | — |
| Protein | 2 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nestea forest has 75% fewer calories (19 kcal vs 76 kcal).
- Oeil de Perdrix has no fat, while Nestea forest has 0.5 g.
- Oeil de Perdrix has 82% less sugar (0.8 g vs 4.5 g).
- Oeil de Perdrix has 75% more protein (2 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Oeil de Perdrix
Not available.
Nestea forest
NESвода, захар, фруктоза, регулатор на киселинността: лимонена киселина, ябълчена киселина и натриеви цитрати, сок от концентрат от: малина (0,1%), арония (0,1%), и касис (0,1%), екстракт от черен чай (0,09%). естествени ароматизанти от червени плодове и други естествени ароматизанти, подсладител: стевиол гликозиди от стевия.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Oeil de Perdrix or Nestea forest?
Overall, Oeil de Perdrix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nestea forest has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Oeil de Perdrix has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.