Comparison
Oeil de Perdrix vs Bib 3L Rosé Piscine Vin Rosé
Overall, Oeil de Perdrix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Oeil de Perdrix | Bib 3L Rosé Piscine Vin Rosé |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 76 kcal | 19 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | — |
| Protein | 2 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bib 3L Rosé Piscine Vin Rosé has 75% fewer calories (19 kcal vs 76 kcal).
- Oeil de Perdrix has no fat, while Bib 3L Rosé Piscine Vin Rosé has 1.4 g.
- Oeil de Perdrix has no saturated fat, while Bib 3L Rosé Piscine Vin Rosé has 0.3 g.
- Bib 3L Rosé Piscine Vin Rosé has 53% less sugar (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
- Oeil de Perdrix has 90% more protein (2 g vs 0.2 g).
Ingredients
Oeil de Perdrix
Not available.
Bib 3L Rosé Piscine Vin Rosé
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Oeil de Perdrix or Bib 3L Rosé Piscine Vin Rosé?
Overall, Oeil de Perdrix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bib 3L Rosé Piscine Vin Rosé has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bib 3L Rosé Piscine Vin Rosé has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Oeil de Perdrix vs Christkindles Markt-Glüh...
Oeil de Perdrix vs Nestea forest
Spatburgunder 2022 trock... vs Oeil de Perdrix
Oeil de Perdrix vs Natureo Syrah -
Oeil de Perdrix vs Tavernello
Oeil de Perdrix vs Rosé Cotes de Provence -...
Bib 3L Rosé Piscine Vin... vs Nestea forest
Spatburgunder 2022 trock... vs Bib 3L Rosé Piscine Vin...