Bib 3L Rosé Piscine Vin Rosé vs Nestea forest
Overall, Nestea forest has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bib 3L Rosé Piscine Vin Rosé | Nestea forest |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 19 kcal | 19 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nestea forest has 64% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
- Nestea forest has no saturated fat, while Bib 3L Rosé Piscine Vin Rosé has 0.3 g.
- Bib 3L Rosé Piscine Vin Rosé has 92% less sugar (0.4 g vs 4.5 g).
- Nestea forest has 60% more protein (0.5 g vs 0.2 g).
Ingredients
Bib 3L Rosé Piscine Vin Rosé
Not available.
Nestea forest
NESвода, захар, фруктоза, регулатор на киселинността: лимонена киселина, ябълчена киселина и натриеви цитрати, сок от концентрат от: малина (0,1%), арония (0,1%), и касис (0,1%), екстракт от черен чай (0,09%). естествени ароматизанти от червени плодове и други естествени ароматизанти, подсладител: стевиол гликозиди от стевия.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bib 3L Rosé Piscine Vin Rosé or Nestea forest?
Overall, Nestea forest has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bib 3L Rosé Piscine Vin Rosé has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 19 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bib 3L Rosé Piscine Vin Rosé has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.