Spatburgunder 2022 trocken franken vs Nestea forest
Overall, Spatburgunder 2022 trocken franken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Spatburgunder 2022 trocken f... | Nestea forest |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 53 kcal | 19 kcal |
| Fat | — | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | — |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nestea forest has 64% fewer calories (19 kcal vs 53 kcal).
- Spatburgunder 2022 trocken franken has 78% less sugar (1 g vs 4.5 g).
- Spatburgunder 2022 trocken franken has 58% more protein (1.2 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Spatburgunder 2022 trocken franken
Not available.
Nestea forest
NESвода, захар, фруктоза, регулатор на киселинността: лимонена киселина, ябълчена киселина и натриеви цитрати, сок от концентрат от: малина (0,1%), арония (0,1%), и касис (0,1%), екстракт от черен чай (0,09%). естествени ароматизанти от червени плодове и други естествени ароматизанти, подсладител: стевиол гликозиди от стевия.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Spatburgunder 2022 trocken franken or Nestea forest?
Overall, Spatburgunder 2022 trocken franken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nestea forest has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 53 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Spatburgunder 2022 trocken franken has less sugar: 1 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.