Nestea forest vs Tavernello
Overall, Tavernello has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Nestea forest | Tavernello |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 19 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tavernello has no calories, while Nestea forest has 19 kcal.
- Tavernello has no fat, while Nestea forest has 0.5 g.
- Tavernello has no sugar, while Nestea forest has 4.5 g.
- Nestea forest has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Tavernello is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Nestea forest
NESвода, захар, фруктоза, регулатор на киселинността: лимонена киселина, ябълчена киселина и натриеви цитрати, сок от концентрат от: малина (0,1%), арония (0,1%), и касис (0,1%), екстракт от черен чай (0,09%). естествени ароматизанти от червени плодове и други естествени ароматизанти, подсладител: стевиол гликозиди от стевия.
Tavernello
vino
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nestea forest or Tavernello?
Overall, Tavernello has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tavernello has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 19 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tavernello has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.