Oeil de Perdrix vs Rosé Cotes de Provence - Fleurs de Prairie
Overall, Oeil de Perdrix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Oeil de Perdrix
Rosé Cotes de Provence - Fleurs de Prairie
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Oeil de Perdrix | Rosé Cotes de Provence - Fle... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 76 kcal | 17 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | — |
| Protein | 2 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rosé Cotes de Provence - Fleurs de Prairie has 78% fewer calories (17 kcal vs 76 kcal).
- Oeil de Perdrix has no fat, while Rosé Cotes de Provence - Fleurs de Prairie has 1 g.
- Oeil de Perdrix has no saturated fat, while Rosé Cotes de Provence - Fleurs de Prairie has 1 g.
- Oeil de Perdrix has 73% less sugar (0.8 g vs 3 g).
- Oeil de Perdrix has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1 g).
- Oeil de Perdrix has 50% more protein (2 g vs 1 g).
- Only Rosé Cotes de Provence - Fleurs de Prairie lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Oeil de Perdrix
Not available.
Rosé Cotes de Provence - Fleurs de Prairie
Contains SULPHITES
FAQ
Which is healthier: Oeil de Perdrix or Rosé Cotes de Provence - Fleurs de Prairie?
Overall, Oeil de Perdrix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rosé Cotes de Provence - Fleurs de Prairie has fewer calories: 17 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Oeil de Perdrix has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 3 g per 100 g.