Rollmops vs Rollmops
Overall, Rollmops has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rollmops | Rollmops |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 102 kcal | 161 kcal |
| Fat | 5.6 g | 10.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 2.8 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 3 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 12.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 6 |
| Allergens | Fish, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Fish, Mustard, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rollmops has 37% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 161 kcal).
- Rollmops has 49% less fat (5.6 g vs 10.9 g).
- Rollmops has 50% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 2.8 g).
- Rollmops has 49% less sugar (2.3 g vs 4.5 g).
- Rollmops has 43% less salt (1.7 g vs 3 g).
- Rollmops is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Rollmops lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Rollmops
Filets de harengs* 44% (Clupea harengus), eau, oignons (sulfites) 8%, sucre, vinaigre, cornichons, sel, épices
Rollmops
Filets de _harengs_ marinés 45% (_harengs_ Clupea harengus pêchés en Atlantique Nord-Est, sel, acidifiant : E260), eau, oignons, cornichons, carottes, vinaigre d'alcool 1,7%, sel, sucre, graines de _moutarde_, acidifiant : E260, antioxydant : E330, E300, E223 (_sulfites_), conservateur : E211, édulcorant : E954, arôme.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rollmops or Rollmops?
Overall, Rollmops has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rollmops has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 161 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rollmops has less sugar: 2.3 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.