Comparison

Rohschinken Gourmet Light, Dulano, Aufschnitten, Kühlschrank vs Salami

Overall, Salami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRohschinken Gourmet Light, D...Salami
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 282 kcal 377 kcal
Fat 25 g 32 g
Saturated fat 10.5 g 14.1 g
Sugars 0.4 g 0.5 g
Salt 2.2 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 13 g 21.5 g
Additives30
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rohschinken Gourmet Light, Dulano, Aufschnitten, Kühlschrank has 25% fewer calories (282 kcal vs 377 kcal).
  • Rohschinken Gourmet Light, Dulano, Aufschnitten, Kühlschrank has 22% less fat (25 g vs 32 g).
  • Rohschinken Gourmet Light, Dulano, Aufschnitten, Kühlschrank has 26% less saturated fat (10.5 g vs 14.1 g).
  • Salami has no salt, while Rohschinken Gourmet Light, Dulano, Aufschnitten, Kühlschrank has 2.2 g.
  • Salami has 40% more protein (21.5 g vs 13 g).
  • Salami has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Rohschinken Gourmet Light, Dulano, Aufschnitten, Kühlschrank

Schweinefleisch (85 %), Trinkwasser, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Gewürze, Dextrose, Stabilisator: Diphosphate, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Schafsaitling, Buchenholzrauch.

Salami

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rohschinken Gourmet Light, Dulano, Aufschnitten, Kühlschrank or Salami?

Overall, Salami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rohschinken Gourmet Light, Dulano, Aufschnitten, Kühlschrank has fewer calories: 282 kcal versus 377 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rohschinken Gourmet Light, Dulano, Aufschnitten, Kühlschrank has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons