Rognon de porc vs Rognons de porc
Overall, Rognon de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rognon de porc | Rognons de porc |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 97 kcal | 127 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 4.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rognon de porc has 24% fewer calories (97 kcal vs 127 kcal).
- Rognon de porc has 36% less fat (3 g vs 4.7 g).
- Rognon de porc has 57% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2.3 g).
- Rognon de porc has no sugar, while Rognons de porc has 0.5 g.
- Rognon de porc has 63% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
- Rognon de porc has 41% more protein (17 g vs 10 g).
- Rognon de porc has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rognon de porc
Not available.
Rognons de porc
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rognon de porc or Rognons de porc?
Overall, Rognon de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rognon de porc has fewer calories: 97 kcal versus 127 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rognon de porc has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.