Comparison

Rognon de porc vs Rognons de porc

Overall, Rognon de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRognon de porcRognons de porc
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group — —
Calories 97 kcal 127 kcal
Fat 3 g 4.7 g
Saturated fat 1 g 2.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.8 g
Fiber — 1.1 g
Protein 17 g 10 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rognon de porc has 24% fewer calories (97 kcal vs 127 kcal).
  • Rognon de porc has 36% less fat (3 g vs 4.7 g).
  • Rognon de porc has 57% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Rognon de porc has no sugar, while Rognons de porc has 0.5 g.
  • Rognon de porc has 63% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Rognon de porc has 41% more protein (17 g vs 10 g).
  • Rognon de porc has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Rognon de porc

Not available.

Rognons de porc

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rognon de porc or Rognons de porc?

Overall, Rognon de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rognon de porc has fewer calories: 97 kcal versus 127 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rognon de porc has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons