Rognon de boeuf vs Rognons de bœuf
Overall, Rognon de boeuf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rognon de boeuf | Rognons de bœuf |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 92 kcal | 103 kcal |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 4.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 17 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rognon de boeuf has 11% fewer calories (92 kcal vs 103 kcal).
- Rognon de boeuf has 36% less fat (2.7 g vs 4.2 g).
- Rognon de boeuf has 77% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 2.2 g).
- Rognon de boeuf has no sugar, while Rognons de bœuf has 0.3 g.
- Rognon de boeuf has 59% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Rognon de boeuf has 24% more protein (17 g vs 13 g).
- Rognon de boeuf has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rognon de boeuf
Not available.
Rognons de bœuf
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rognon de boeuf or Rognons de bœuf?
Overall, Rognon de boeuf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rognon de boeuf has fewer calories: 92 kcal versus 103 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rognon de boeuf has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.