Comparison

Rognon de boeuf vs Rognons de bœuf

Overall, Rognon de boeuf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRognon de boeufRognons de bœuf
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group — —
Calories 92 kcal 103 kcal
Fat 2.7 g 4.2 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 2.2 g
Sugars 0 g 0.3 g
Salt 0.5 g 1.1 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 17 g 13 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rognon de boeuf has 11% fewer calories (92 kcal vs 103 kcal).
  • Rognon de boeuf has 36% less fat (2.7 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Rognon de boeuf has 77% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Rognon de boeuf has no sugar, while Rognons de bœuf has 0.3 g.
  • Rognon de boeuf has 59% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Rognon de boeuf has 24% more protein (17 g vs 13 g).
  • Rognon de boeuf has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Rognon de boeuf

Not available.

Rognons de bœuf

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rognon de boeuf or Rognons de bœuf?

Overall, Rognon de boeuf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rognon de boeuf has fewer calories: 92 kcal versus 103 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rognon de boeuf has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons