Rognon de boeuf vs Rognons de bœuf
Overall, Rognon de boeuf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rognon de boeuf | Rognons de bœuf |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 92 kcal | 116 kcal |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 4.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 17 g | 15.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rognon de boeuf has 21% fewer calories (92 kcal vs 116 kcal).
- Rognon de boeuf has 37% less fat (2.7 g vs 4.3 g).
- Rognon de boeuf has 69% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
- Rognon de boeuf has no sugar, while Rognons de bœuf has 1.5 g.
- Rognon de boeuf has 54% less salt (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Rognon de boeuf has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rognon de boeuf
Not available.
Rognons de bœuf
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rognon de boeuf or Rognons de bœuf?
Overall, Rognon de boeuf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rognon de boeuf has fewer calories: 92 kcal versus 116 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rognon de boeuf has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.