Rodekool Chou rouge vs Rode kool
Overall, Rodekool Chou rouge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rodekool Chou rouge | Rode kool |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 54 kcal | 47 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 10.4 g | 8.9 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rode kool has 13% fewer calories (47 kcal vs 54 kcal).
- Rode kool has 14% less sugar (8.9 g vs 10.4 g).
- Rodekool Chou rouge has 33% more fiber (2.4 g vs 1.6 g).
- Rodekool Chou rouge has 36% more protein (1.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Rodekool Chou rouge has the better Nutri-Score.
- Rodekool Chou rouge is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Rodekool Chou rouge
93% chou rouge, sucre, 0,7% vinaigre d'alcool, sel.
Rode kool
Chóux rouges, eau, sucre, morceaux de A consommer pommes 6,5%, vinaigre naturel, amidon de mais modifié, sel. Nettogewicht Kijk voor informatie op: HAK België, Vitseroelstraat 74 Pour plus d'information: 180g B-1740 Ternat www.HAK.be
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rodekool Chou rouge or Rode kool?
Overall, Rodekool Chou rouge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rode kool has fewer calories: 47 kcal versus 54 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rode kool has less sugar: 8.9 g versus 10.4 g per 100 g.