Comparison

Bio choux rouge vs Rode kool

Overall, Rode kool has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBio choux rougeRode kool
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group — 4
Calories 70 kcal 47 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 15 g 8.9 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.4 g
Fiber 2.3 g 1.6 g
Protein 1 g 0.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rode kool has 33% fewer calories (47 kcal vs 70 kcal).
  • Rode kool has no fat, while Bio choux rouge has 0.5 g.
  • Rode kool has 41% less sugar (8.9 g vs 15 g).
  • Rode kool has 55% less salt (0.4 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Bio choux rouge has 30% more fiber (2.3 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Bio choux rouge has 30% more protein (1 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Rode kool has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Bio choux rouge

Not available.

Rode kool

Chóux rouges, eau, sucre, morceaux de A consommer pommes 6,5%, vinaigre naturel, amidon de mais modifié, sel. Nettogewicht Kijk voor informatie op: HAK België, Vitseroelstraat 74 Pour plus d'information: 180g B-1740 Ternat www.HAK.be

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bio choux rouge or Rode kool?

Overall, Rode kool has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rode kool has fewer calories: 47 kcal versus 70 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rode kool has less sugar: 8.9 g versus 15 g per 100 g.

More comparisons