Comparison

Rodekool Chou rouge vs Bio choux rouge

Overall, Rodekool Chou rouge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRodekool Chou rougeBio choux rouge
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 54 kcal 70 kcal
Fat 0.1 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 10.4 g 15 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.9 g
Fiber 2.4 g 2.3 g
Protein 1.1 g 1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rodekool Chou rouge has 23% fewer calories (54 kcal vs 70 kcal).
  • Rodekool Chou rouge has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Rodekool Chou rouge has 31% less sugar (10.4 g vs 15 g).
  • Rodekool Chou rouge has 43% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Rodekool Chou rouge has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Rodekool Chou rouge

93% chou rouge, sucre, 0,7% vinaigre d'alcool, sel.

Bio choux rouge

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rodekool Chou rouge or Bio choux rouge?

Overall, Rodekool Chou rouge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rodekool Chou rouge has fewer calories: 54 kcal versus 70 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rodekool Chou rouge has less sugar: 10.4 g versus 15 g per 100 g.

More comparisons