Rode Kool met appel vs Snoepgroente: Wortelen
Overall, Snoepgroente: Wortelen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Rode Kool met appel
Snoepgroente: Wortelen
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rode Kool met appel | Snoepgroente: Wortelen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 58 kcal | 33 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 8.6 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 4.4 g |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Snoepgroente: Wortelen has 43% fewer calories (33 kcal vs 58 kcal).
- Snoepgroente: Wortelen has 44% less fat (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Snoepgroente: Wortelen has 53% less sugar (4 g vs 8.6 g).
- Snoepgroente: Wortelen has no salt, while Rode Kool met appel has 0.6 g.
- Snoepgroente: Wortelen has 59% more fiber (4.4 g vs 1.8 g).
- Rode Kool met appel has 31% more protein (1.6 g vs 1.1 g).
- Snoepgroente: Wortelen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Snoepgroente: Wortelen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Rode Kool met appel
61% rodekool, water, 10% appelpuree, suiker, 2,5% appelstukje, aardappelzetmeel, raapolie, zeezout, azijn, specerijen, zuurteregelaar (citroenzuur [E330]).
Snoepgroente: Wortelen
Wortel, antioxidant (calciumascorbaat [E302]).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rode Kool met appel or Snoepgroente: Wortelen?
Overall, Snoepgroente: Wortelen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Snoepgroente: Wortelen has fewer calories: 33 kcal versus 58 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Snoepgroente: Wortelen has less sugar: 4 g versus 8.6 g per 100 g.