Comparison

Rochers coco vs Rochers coco

Overall, Rochers coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRochers cocoRochers coco
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 423 kcal 436 kcal
Fat 21 g 20.2 g
Saturated fat 20 g 17.9 g
Sugars 39 g 45.3 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 4.2 g 4.3 g
Protein 4.1 g 3.4 g
Additives00
AllergensEggsEggs, Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, A

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rochers coco has 11% less saturated fat (17.9 g vs 20 g).
  • Rochers coco has 14% less sugar (39 g vs 45.3 g).
  • Rochers coco has 17% more protein (4.1 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Only Rochers coco lists: Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, A.

Ingredients

Rochers coco

Sucre, noix de coco 28%. eau, farine de riz, blancs d'oeufs 8%, sirop de sucre inverti, flocons de pomme de terre, sirop de glucose, sucre vanillé (Sucre, arôme naturel de vanille), arôme naturel de noix de coco.

Rochers coco

Noix de coco séchée râpée (31,0%), sucre, sirop de glucose, fécule de pomme de terre, blanc d'ŒUF, dextrose.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rochers coco or Rochers coco?

Overall, Rochers coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rochers coco has fewer calories: 423 kcal versus 436 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rochers coco has less sugar: 39 g versus 45.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons