Comparison

Mini Rochers Noix de Coco vs Rochers coco

Overall, Rochers coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMini Rochers Noix de CocoRochers coco
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 446 kcal 436 kcal
Fat 23 g 20.2 g
Saturated fat 21 g 17.9 g
Sugars 52 g 45.3 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 8.3 g 4.3 g
Protein 3.8 g 3.4 g
Additives00
AllergensEggsEggs, Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, A

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rochers coco has 12% less fat (20.2 g vs 23 g).
  • Rochers coco has 15% less saturated fat (17.9 g vs 21 g).
  • Rochers coco has 13% less sugar (45.3 g vs 52 g).
  • Mini Rochers Noix de Coco has 48% more fiber (8.3 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Mini Rochers Noix de Coco has 11% more protein (3.8 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Only Rochers coco lists: Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, A.

Ingredients

Mini Rochers Noix de Coco

Noix de coco 31%, sucre, sirop de glucose, blanc d'_oeuf_, dextrose, farine de riz.

Rochers coco

Noix de coco séchée râpée (31,0%), sucre, sirop de glucose, fécule de pomme de terre, blanc d'ŒUF, dextrose.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mini Rochers Noix de Coco or Rochers coco?

Overall, Rochers coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rochers coco has fewer calories: 436 kcal versus 446 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rochers coco has less sugar: 45.3 g versus 52 g per 100 g.

More comparisons