Comparison

Rochers coco vs Crimbles Coconut Macarons IMP

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRochers cocoCrimbles Coconut Macarons IM...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 436 kcal 442 kcal
Fat 20.2 g 21.3 g
Saturated fat 17.9 g 19.8 g
Sugars 45.3 g 41 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 4.3 g 3.1 g
Protein 3.4 g 3.8 g
Additives00
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, AEggs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rochers coco has 28% more fiber (4.3 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Crimbles Coconut Macarons IMP has 11% more protein (3.8 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Only Rochers coco lists: Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, A.

Ingredients

Rochers coco

Noix de coco séchée râpée (31,0%), sucre, sirop de glucose, fécule de pomme de terre, blanc d'ŒUF, dextrose.

Crimbles Coconut Macarons IMP

Kokosnoot 30%, suiker, glucosestroop, kippenei-eiwit, aardappelzetmeel, dextrose, rijstmeel.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rochers coco or Crimbles Coconut Macarons IMP?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rochers coco has fewer calories: 436 kcal versus 442 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Crimbles Coconut Macarons IMP has less sugar: 41 g versus 45.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons