Comparison
Rochers coco vs Rochers coco
Overall, Rochers coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rochers coco | Rochers coco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 423 kcal | 436 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 20.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 20 g | 17.9 g |
| Sugars | 39 g | 45.3 g |
| Salt | — | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 4.3 g |
| Protein | 4.1 g | 3.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, A |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rochers coco has 11% less saturated fat (17.9 g vs 20 g).
- Rochers coco has 14% less sugar (39 g vs 45.3 g).
- Rochers coco has 17% more protein (4.1 g vs 3.4 g).
- Only Rochers coco lists: Eggs, Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, A.
Ingredients
Rochers coco
Not available.
Rochers coco
Noix de coco séchée râpée (31,0%), sucre, sirop de glucose, fécule de pomme de terre, blanc d'ŒUF, dextrose.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rochers coco or Rochers coco?
Overall, Rochers coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rochers coco has fewer calories: 423 kcal versus 436 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rochers coco has less sugar: 39 g versus 45.3 g per 100 g.