Comparison
Rochers coco vs Poppies Creola
Overall, Rochers coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rochers coco | Poppies Creola |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 423 kcal | 467 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 20 g | 23 g |
| Sugars | 39 g | 50 g |
| Salt | — | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 5.2 g |
| Protein | 4.1 g | 3.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rochers coco has 19% less fat (21 g vs 26 g).
- Rochers coco has 13% less saturated fat (20 g vs 23 g).
- Rochers coco has 22% less sugar (39 g vs 50 g).
- Only Poppies Creola lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Rochers coco
Not available.
Poppies Creola
noix de coco 31%, sucre, sirop de glucose, blanc d'_oeuf_, dextrose, farine de riz
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rochers coco or Poppies Creola?
Overall, Rochers coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rochers coco has fewer calories: 423 kcal versus 467 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rochers coco has less sugar: 39 g versus 50 g per 100 g.