Rocher coco vs Organic Blonde Chocolate
Overall, Organic Blonde Chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rocher coco | Organic Blonde Chocolate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 598 kcal | 605 kcal |
| Fat | 41 g | 43.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 26 g | 26.3 g |
| Sugars | 52 g | 45.1 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 5.1 g | 7.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans, Lécithine de soja, Poudre de lait | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Organic Blonde Chocolate has 13% less sugar (45.1 g vs 52 g).
- Organic Blonde Chocolate has 35% more protein (7.9 g vs 5.1 g).
- Only Rocher coco lists: Lécithine de soja, Poudre de lait.
Ingredients
Rocher coco
Sucre, beurre de cacao, poudre de lait, beurre laitier concentré, lactose, noix de coco caramélisée 4% (noix de coco, sucre), émulsifiant (lécithine de soja), arôme naturel, arôme. Peut contenir du blé, des noisettes, des amandes et d'autres fruits à coque.
Organic Blonde Chocolate
Organic Cane Sugar, Organic Cocoa Butter, Organic Whole Milk Powder, Organic Caramelised Sugar Powder, Emulsifier: Organic Lecithins (Soya); Sea Salt*, Natural Caramel Flavouring*, Organic Vanilla Extract.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rocher coco or Organic Blonde Chocolate?
Overall, Organic Blonde Chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rocher coco has fewer calories: 598 kcal versus 605 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Organic Blonde Chocolate has less sugar: 45.1 g versus 52 g per 100 g.