Roasted Chicken Base vs Chicken Stock Pot
Overall, Chicken Stock Pot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Roasted Chicken Base
Chicken Stock Pot
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Roasted Chicken Base | Chicken Stock Pot |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 250 kcal | 126 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 16.7 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 14.6 g | 14 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 16.7 g | 19.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chicken Stock Pot has 50% fewer calories (126 kcal vs 250 kcal).
- Roasted Chicken Base has no fat, while Chicken Stock Pot has 1.1 g.
- Roasted Chicken Base has no saturated fat, while Chicken Stock Pot has 0.3 g.
- Chicken Stock Pot has 87% less sugar (2.2 g vs 16.7 g).
- Chicken Stock Pot has 100% more fiber (2.2 g vs 0 g).
- Chicken Stock Pot has 16% more protein (19.9 g vs 16.7 g).
Ingredients
Roasted Chicken Base
Roasted chicken, maltodextrin, salt, chicken stock, cane sugar, food starch, yeast extract, flavoring, turmeric, natural flavors.
Chicken Stock Pot
Water · Yeast Extract · Salt · Chicken Stock (Water · Chicken Bones · Chicken · Salt · Chicken Fat) · Dried Glucose · Stabiliser: Tara Gum · Dried Carrots · Dried Garlic · Dried Herbs (Parsley · Bay · Thyme · Rosemary) · Concentrated Onion Juice · Ground Black Pepper.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Roasted Chicken Base or Chicken Stock Pot?
Overall, Chicken Stock Pot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chicken Stock Pot has fewer calories: 126 kcal versus 250 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chicken Stock Pot has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 16.7 g per 100 g.