Comparison
Riz pour risotto vs Risotto Rice
Overall, Riz pour risotto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz pour risotto | Risotto Rice |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 352 kcal | 348 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 7.4 g | 6.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Riz pour risotto
Riz pour risotto
Risotto Rice
Arborio Rice
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz pour risotto or Risotto Rice?
Overall, Riz pour risotto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Risotto Rice has fewer calories: 348 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz pour risotto has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Riz pour risotto vs Risotto inratable
Witte carnaroli rijst vs Riz pour risotto
Riz pour risotto vs Riz pour Risotto Crémeux...
Riz pour risotto vs Risotto Reis Ribe
Risotto Rice vs Risotto milanese
Riz spécial Risotto vs Risotto Rice
Risotto inratable vs Risotto Rice
Witte carnaroli rijst vs Risotto Rice