Comparison

Riz cacao et calcium vs Lait UHT choco + calcium

Overall, Lait UHT choco + calcium has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientRiz cacao et calciumLait UHT choco + calcium
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 78 kcal 44 kcal
Fat 1.6 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.1 g
Sugars 7.1 g 7.4 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 1.2 g 0.4 g
Protein 0.4 g 0.4 g
Additives11
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lait UHT choco + calcium has 44% fewer calories (44 kcal vs 78 kcal).
  • Lait UHT choco + calcium has 94% less fat (0.1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Lait UHT choco + calcium has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Riz cacao et calcium has 71% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Lait UHT choco + calcium has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Riz cacao et calcium

Eau, riz* 16%, sirop de riz*, cacao* 1%, huile de tournesol* pressée à froid, épaississant : stabilisant : gomme guar*; sel marin. *Ingrédients issus de l'Agriculture Biologique.

Lait UHT choco + calcium

Eau; riz 7%; sucre; cacao maigre 1,2%; phosphate de tricalcium; stabilisateur : gomme gellane; sel; arôme; vitamines D2 et B12.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Riz cacao et calcium or Lait UHT choco + calcium?

Overall, Lait UHT choco + calcium has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lait UHT choco + calcium has fewer calories: 44 kcal versus 78 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Riz cacao et calcium has less sugar: 7.1 g versus 7.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons