Lait UHT choco + calcium vs Rizskakaó
Overall, Lait UHT choco + calcium has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Lait UHT choco + calcium | Rizskakaó |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 44 kcal | 68 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 7.4 g | 6.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lait UHT choco + calcium has 35% fewer calories (44 kcal vs 68 kcal).
- Lait UHT choco + calcium has 86% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Rizskakaó has 12% less sugar (6.5 g vs 7.4 g).
- Lait UHT choco + calcium has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Lait UHT choco + calcium
Eau; riz 7%; sucre; cacao maigre 1,2%; phosphate de tricalcium; stabilisateur : gomme gellane; sel; arôme; vitamines D2 et B12.
Rizskakaó
Spring water, Italian rice* (17%), apple juice*, low fat cocoa powder* (1,5%), sunflower oil*, safflower oil*, sea salt, thickener: carrageenan. * = organic.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lait UHT choco + calcium or Rizskakaó?
Overall, Lait UHT choco + calcium has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lait UHT choco + calcium has fewer calories: 44 kcal versus 68 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rizskakaó has less sugar: 6.5 g versus 7.4 g per 100 g.