Rice Drink Moka vs Lait UHT choco + calcium
Overall, Lait UHT choco + calcium has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Rice Drink Moka | Lait UHT choco + calcium |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 69 kcal | 44 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 8 g | 7.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lait UHT choco + calcium has 36% fewer calories (44 kcal vs 69 kcal).
- Lait UHT choco + calcium has 90% less fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Lait UHT choco + calcium has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Rice Drink Moka lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Rice Drink Moka
Eau, riz 17% sirop de riz, café de céréales torréfiées 1% (chicorée, seigle, orge, glands), huile de tournesol pressé à froid, épaississant : gomme de guar, arôme naturel, sel marin.
Lait UHT choco + calcium
Eau; riz 7%; sucre; cacao maigre 1,2%; phosphate de tricalcium; stabilisateur : gomme gellane; sel; arôme; vitamines D2 et B12.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rice Drink Moka or Lait UHT choco + calcium?
Overall, Lait UHT choco + calcium has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lait UHT choco + calcium has fewer calories: 44 kcal versus 69 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lait UHT choco + calcium has less sugar: 7.4 g versus 8 g per 100 g.