Rice Drink Moka vs Rizskakaó
Overall, Rizskakaó has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Rice Drink Moka | Rizskakaó |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 69 kcal | 68 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 8 g | 6.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rizskakaó has 30% less fat (0.7 g vs 1 g).
- Rizskakaó has 19% less sugar (6.5 g vs 8 g).
- Only Rice Drink Moka lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Rice Drink Moka
Eau, riz 17% sirop de riz, café de céréales torréfiées 1% (chicorée, seigle, orge, glands), huile de tournesol pressé à froid, épaississant : gomme de guar, arôme naturel, sel marin.
Rizskakaó
Spring water, Italian rice* (17%), apple juice*, low fat cocoa powder* (1,5%), sunflower oil*, safflower oil*, sea salt, thickener: carrageenan. * = organic.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rice Drink Moka or Rizskakaó?
Overall, Rizskakaó has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rizskakaó has fewer calories: 68 kcal versus 69 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rizskakaó has less sugar: 6.5 g versus 8 g per 100 g.