Riz cacao et calcium vs Rice Cocoa
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Riz cacao et calcium | Rice Cocoa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 78 kcal | 68 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 7.1 g | 10.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rice Cocoa has 13% fewer calories (68 kcal vs 78 kcal).
- Rice Cocoa has 50% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.6 g).
- Riz cacao et calcium has 32% less sugar (7.1 g vs 10.4 g).
- Riz cacao et calcium has 43% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0.7 g).
Ingredients
Riz cacao et calcium
Eau, riz* 16%, sirop de riz*, cacao* 1%, huile de tournesol* pressée à froid, épaississant : stabilisant : gomme guar*; sel marin. *Ingrédients issus de l'Agriculture Biologique.
Rice Cocoa
Acqua, riso biologico (16%), Cacao in polvere biologico (1,5%), sciroppo d'Agave biologico (1%), olio di riso, stabilizzante (gomma di gellano), sale.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz cacao et calcium or Rice Cocoa?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rice Cocoa has fewer calories: 68 kcal versus 78 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz cacao et calcium has less sugar: 7.1 g versus 10.4 g per 100 g.