Comparison

Lait UHT choco + calcium vs Rice Cocoa

Overall, Lait UHT choco + calcium has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientLait UHT choco + calciumRice Cocoa
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 44 kcal 68 kcal
Fat 0.1 g 0.8 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.3 g
Sugars 7.4 g 10.4 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.4 g 0.7 g
Protein 0.4 g 0.5 g
Additives11
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lait UHT choco + calcium has 35% fewer calories (44 kcal vs 68 kcal).
  • Lait UHT choco + calcium has 88% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Lait UHT choco + calcium has 29% less sugar (7.4 g vs 10.4 g).
  • Rice Cocoa has 49% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Lait UHT choco + calcium has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Lait UHT choco + calcium

Eau; riz 7%; sucre; cacao maigre 1,2%; phosphate de tricalcium; stabilisateur : gomme gellane; sel; arôme; vitamines D2 et B12.

Rice Cocoa

Acqua, riso biologico (16%), Cacao in polvere biologico (1,5%), sciroppo d'Agave biologico (1%), olio di riso, stabilizzante (gomma di gellano), sale.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lait UHT choco + calcium or Rice Cocoa?

Overall, Lait UHT choco + calcium has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lait UHT choco + calcium has fewer calories: 44 kcal versus 68 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lait UHT choco + calcium has less sugar: 7.4 g versus 10.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons