Riz cacao et calcium vs Rizskakaó
Overall, Rizskakaó has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Riz cacao et calcium | Rizskakaó |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 78 kcal | 68 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 7.1 g | 6.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rizskakaó has 13% fewer calories (68 kcal vs 78 kcal).
- Rizskakaó has 56% less fat (0.7 g vs 1.6 g).
- Riz cacao et calcium has 51% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0.6 g).
Ingredients
Riz cacao et calcium
Eau, riz* 16%, sirop de riz*, cacao* 1%, huile de tournesol* pressée à froid, épaississant : stabilisant : gomme guar*; sel marin. *Ingrédients issus de l'Agriculture Biologique.
Rizskakaó
Spring water, Italian rice* (17%), apple juice*, low fat cocoa powder* (1,5%), sunflower oil*, safflower oil*, sea salt, thickener: carrageenan. * = organic.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz cacao et calcium or Rizskakaó?
Overall, Rizskakaó has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rizskakaó has fewer calories: 68 kcal versus 78 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rizskakaó has less sugar: 6.5 g versus 7.1 g per 100 g.