Rindersalami vs Salami Tipici Lucani
Overall, Salami Tipici Lucani has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rindersalami | Salami Tipici Lucani |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 316 kcal | 335 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 25.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 8.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 3.6 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | — |
| Protein | 21.5 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salami Tipici Lucani has 24% less saturated fat (8.4 g vs 11 g).
- Rindersalami has 72% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.8 g).
- Salami Tipici Lucani has 17% less salt (3 g vs 3.6 g).
- Salami Tipici Lucani has 10% more protein (24 g vs 21.5 g).
Ingredients
Rindersalami
Rindfleisch, Speisesalz, Dextrose, Gewürze, Glukosesirup, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Reifekulturen, Buchenholzrauch.
Salami Tipici Lucani
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rindersalami or Salami Tipici Lucani?
Overall, Salami Tipici Lucani has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rindersalami has fewer calories: 316 kcal versus 335 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rindersalami has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.