Rindersalami vs Salami de bœuf
Overall, Salami de bœuf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rindersalami | Salami de bœuf |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 316 kcal | 323 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3.6 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 21.5 g | 27 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salami de bœuf has no saturated fat, while Rindersalami has 11 g.
- Salami de bœuf has no sugar, while Rindersalami has 0.5 g.
- Salami de bœuf has 17% less salt (3 g vs 3.6 g).
- Rindersalami has 100% more fiber (0.4 g vs 0 g).
- Salami de bœuf has 20% more protein (27 g vs 21.5 g).
- Salami de bœuf has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rindersalami
Rindfleisch, Speisesalz, Dextrose, Gewürze, Glukosesirup, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Reifekulturen, Buchenholzrauch.
Salami de bœuf
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rindersalami or Salami de bœuf?
Overall, Salami de bœuf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rindersalami has fewer calories: 316 kcal versus 323 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salami de bœuf has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.