Rindersalami vs Salami bio
Overall, Rindersalami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rindersalami | Salami bio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 316 kcal | 388 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 32 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 13 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3.6 g | 3.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | — |
| Protein | 21.5 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rindersalami has 19% fewer calories (316 kcal vs 388 kcal).
- Rindersalami has 22% less fat (25 g vs 32 g).
- Rindersalami has 15% less saturated fat (11 g vs 13 g).
- Salami bio has no sugar, while Rindersalami has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Rindersalami
Rindfleisch, Speisesalz, Dextrose, Gewürze, Glukosesirup, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Reifekulturen, Buchenholzrauch.
Salami bio
viande de boeuf*, graisse de porc*, sel de mer, protéines de pois, dextrose*, épices* (poivre*, noix de muscade*, ail en poudre*), antioxydant: acide ascorbique, acidifiant: citrate de sodium. *Issu de l'agriculture biologique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rindersalami or Salami bio?
Overall, Rindersalami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rindersalami has fewer calories: 316 kcal versus 388 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salami bio has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.