Rinder-Cevapcici vs Cevapcici
Overall, Rinder-Cevapcici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rinder-Cevapcici | Cevapcici |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 243 kcal | 264 kcal |
| Fat | 19 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.1 g | 9.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rinder-Cevapcici has 14% less fat (19 g vs 22 g).
- Rinder-Cevapcici has 56% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.6 g).
- Rinder-Cevapcici has 22% less salt (1.4 g vs 1.8 g).
- Rinder-Cevapcici has 12% more protein (17 g vs 15 g).
- Only Cevapcici lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Rinder-Cevapcici
Salz,E300,Gewürz,E160c,Rindfleisch
Cevapcici
Schweine - und Rindfleisch (92%). Speck, Speisesalz, Paprikaflocken, Gewürze, Speisewürze, Rapsöl, Gewürzextrakte, Zucker, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure, Stabilisator: Diphosphate, Aroma. Nach dem Öffnen innerhalb von 3 Tagen aufbrauchen. Gluten - und Laktosefrei!
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rinder-Cevapcici or Cevapcici?
Overall, Rinder-Cevapcici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rinder-Cevapcici has fewer calories: 243 kcal versus 264 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rinder-Cevapcici has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.