Cevapcici vs Cevapcici
Overall, Cevapcici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cevapcici | Cevapcici |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 292 kcal | 264 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 9.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 15 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cevapcici has 12% less fat (22 g vs 25 g).
- Cevapcici has 69% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
- Cevapcici has 28% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.8 g).
- Only Cevapcici lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Cevapcici
Not available.
Cevapcici
Schweine - und Rindfleisch (92%). Speck, Speisesalz, Paprikaflocken, Gewürze, Speisewürze, Rapsöl, Gewürzextrakte, Zucker, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure, Stabilisator: Diphosphate, Aroma. Nach dem Öffnen innerhalb von 3 Tagen aufbrauchen. Gluten - und Laktosefrei!
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cevapcici or Cevapcici?
Overall, Cevapcici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cevapcici has fewer calories: 264 kcal versus 292 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cevapcici has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.