Cevapcici vs Cevapcici
Overall, Cevapcici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cevapcici | Cevapcici |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 292 kcal | 245 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 7.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 15 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cevapcici has 16% fewer calories (245 kcal vs 292 kcal).
- Cevapcici has 20% less fat (20 g vs 25 g).
- Cevapcici has 28% less saturated fat (7.9 g vs 11 g).
- Cevapcici has 24% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.7 g).
- Cevapcici has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cevapcici
Not available.
Cevapcici
Rindfleisch (87%); Wasser; Speisesalz; Gewürze; Säureregulator: NatriumLactat, Natriumacetate; Kräuter; Zucker; Gewürzextrakte.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cevapcici or Cevapcici?
Overall, Cevapcici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cevapcici has fewer calories: 245 kcal versus 292 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cevapcici has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.