Banjaluški čevapčiči vs Cevapcici
Overall, Cevapcici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Banjaluški čevapčiči | Cevapcici |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 242 kcal | 245 kcal |
| Fat | 18.3 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.3 g | 7.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 17.2 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cevapcici has 15% less salt (1.7 g vs 2 g).
- Cevapcici has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Banjaluški čevapčiči
49% svinjsko meso, 47% goveje meso, jedilna sol, začimbe, antioksidanta: askorbinska kislina, natrijev askorbat; sredstvo za uravnavanje kislosti: natrijevi acetati; aroma. Lahko vsebuje sledi mleka. Poreklo mesa: EU. Proizvedeno v Sloveniji.
Cevapcici
Rindfleisch (87%); Wasser; Speisesalz; Gewürze; Säureregulator: NatriumLactat, Natriumacetate; Kräuter; Zucker; Gewürzextrakte.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Banjaluški čevapčiči or Cevapcici?
Overall, Cevapcici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Banjaluški čevapčiči has fewer calories: 242 kcal versus 245 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Banjaluški čevapčiči has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.