Rinder-Cevapcici vs Banjaluški čevapčiči
Overall, Banjaluški čevapčiči has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rinder-Cevapcici | Banjaluški čevapčiči |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 243 kcal | 242 kcal |
| Fat | 19 g | 18.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.1 g | 7.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 17.2 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Banjaluški čevapčiči has 28% less saturated fat (7.3 g vs 10.1 g).
- Rinder-Cevapcici has 30% less salt (1.4 g vs 2 g).
- Banjaluški čevapčiči is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Rinder-Cevapcici
Salz,E300,Gewürz,E160c,Rindfleisch
Banjaluški čevapčiči
49% svinjsko meso, 47% goveje meso, jedilna sol, začimbe, antioksidanta: askorbinska kislina, natrijev askorbat; sredstvo za uravnavanje kislosti: natrijevi acetati; aroma. Lahko vsebuje sledi mleka. Poreklo mesa: EU. Proizvedeno v Sloveniji.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rinder-Cevapcici or Banjaluški čevapčiči?
Overall, Banjaluški čevapčiči has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Banjaluški čevapčiči has fewer calories: 242 kcal versus 243 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Banjaluški čevapčiči has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.