Rinder-Cevapcici vs Leskovački čevapčiči
Overall, Leskovački čevapčiči has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rinder-Cevapcici | Leskovački čevapčiči |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 243 kcal | 242 kcal |
| Fat | 19 g | 18.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.1 g | 7.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 18.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Leskovački čevapčiči has 25% less saturated fat (7.6 g vs 10.1 g).
- Rinder-Cevapcici has 22% less salt (1.4 g vs 1.8 g).
- Leskovački čevapčiči has 10% more protein (18.9 g vs 17 g).
- Leskovački čevapčiči has the better Nutri-Score.
- Leskovački čevapčiči is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Rinder-Cevapcici
Salz,E300,Gewürz,E160c,Rindfleisch
Leskovački čevapčiči
Svinjsko meso 48%, goveje meso 48%, kuh. sol, čebula, poper, antioksidanta (E300, E301), sredstvo za uravnavanje kislosti (E262), aroma. Lahko vsebuje sledi mleka. Pakirano v kontrolirani atmosferi. Potrebno toplotno obdelati najmanj do Ts +74°C. Hraniti pri temperaturi do +4°C. Po odprtju porabiti takoj.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rinder-Cevapcici or Leskovački čevapčiči?
Overall, Leskovački čevapčiči has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Leskovački čevapčiči has fewer calories: 242 kcal versus 243 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Leskovački čevapčiči has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.