Cevapcici vs Cevapcici
Overall, Cevapcici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cevapcici | Cevapcici |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 264 kcal | 245 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.9 g | 7.9 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cevapcici has 20% less saturated fat (7.9 g vs 9.9 g).
- Cevapcici has 69% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
- Cevapcici has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Cevapcici lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Cevapcici
Schweine - und Rindfleisch (92%). Speck, Speisesalz, Paprikaflocken, Gewürze, Speisewürze, Rapsöl, Gewürzextrakte, Zucker, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure, Stabilisator: Diphosphate, Aroma. Nach dem Öffnen innerhalb von 3 Tagen aufbrauchen. Gluten - und Laktosefrei!
Cevapcici
Rindfleisch (87%); Wasser; Speisesalz; Gewürze; Säureregulator: NatriumLactat, Natriumacetate; Kräuter; Zucker; Gewürzextrakte.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cevapcici or Cevapcici?
Overall, Cevapcici has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cevapcici has fewer calories: 245 kcal versus 264 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cevapcici has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.