Rich Tea Finger Biscuits vs Eit Whela digestive
Overall, Rich Tea Finger Biscuits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rich Tea Finger Biscuits | Eit Whela digestive |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 460 kcal | 499 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 6 g | 14 g |
| Sugars | 18 g | 7.7 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | — |
| Fiber | 8 g | 4.1 g |
| Protein | 8 g | 2.6 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rich Tea Finger Biscuits has 39% less fat (14 g vs 23 g).
- Rich Tea Finger Biscuits has 57% less saturated fat (6 g vs 14 g).
- Eit Whela digestive has 57% less sugar (7.7 g vs 18 g).
- Rich Tea Finger Biscuits has 49% more fiber (8 g vs 4.1 g).
- Rich Tea Finger Biscuits has 68% more protein (8 g vs 2.6 g).
- Rich Tea Finger Biscuits has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Eit Whela digestive lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Rich Tea Finger Biscuits
Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Sugar, Palm Oil, Barley Malt Extract, Partially Inverted Sugar Syrup, Salt, Raising Agents (Sodium Bicarbonate, Ammonium Bicarbonate)
Eit Whela digestive
wheat flour, sugar, vegetable oils, cocoa mass, cocoa butter, milk powder, whey powder, emulsifier, salt, leavening agents, flavoring
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rich Tea Finger Biscuits or Eit Whela digestive?
Overall, Rich Tea Finger Biscuits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rich Tea Finger Biscuits has fewer calories: 460 kcal versus 499 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Eit Whela digestive has less sugar: 7.7 g versus 18 g per 100 g.