Ricciarelli di Siena IGP vs Ricciarelli di siena
Overall, Ricciarelli di Siena IGP has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricciarelli di Siena IGP | Ricciarelli di siena |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 459 kcal | 464 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 3.7 g |
| Sugars | 49 g | 51 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricciarelli di Siena IGP has 49% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 3.7 g).
- Only Ricciarelli di siena lists: Eggs, Nuts.
Ingredients
Ricciarelli di Siena IGP
Not available.
Ricciarelli di siena
Mandorle 45%, Zucchero, Albume d'Uovo, Miele, Agente Lievitante (Carbonato acido d'Ammonio), Conservante: Acido Sorbico.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricciarelli di Siena IGP or Ricciarelli di siena?
Overall, Ricciarelli di Siena IGP has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricciarelli di Siena IGP has fewer calories: 459 kcal versus 464 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricciarelli di Siena IGP has less sugar: 49 g versus 51 g per 100 g.