Ricciarelli vs Ricciarelli di siena
Overall, Ricciarelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ricciarelli | Ricciarelli di siena |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 478 kcal | 464 kcal |
| Fat | 25.8 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 3.7 g |
| Sugars | 45.4 g | 51 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 12.4 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricciarelli has 41% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 3.7 g).
- Ricciarelli has 11% less sugar (45.4 g vs 51 g).
- Ricciarelli has 100% more fiber (5.1 g vs 0 g).
- Ricciarelli has 19% more protein (12.4 g vs 10 g).
- Ricciarelli has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Ricciarelli di siena lists: Eggs, Nuts.
Ingredients
Ricciarelli
Not available.
Ricciarelli di siena
Mandorle 45%, Zucchero, Albume d'Uovo, Miele, Agente Lievitante (Carbonato acido d'Ammonio), Conservante: Acido Sorbico.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ricciarelli or Ricciarelli di siena?
Overall, Ricciarelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ricciarelli di siena has fewer calories: 464 kcal versus 478 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricciarelli has less sugar: 45.4 g versus 51 g per 100 g.