Red Leicester Slices vs Wensleydale with cranberry
Overall, Wensleydale with cranberry has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Red Leicester Slices | Wensleydale with cranberry |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 403 kcal | 353 kcal |
| Fat | 33.6 g | 24.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 21.1 g | 15.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 14.3 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 18.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wensleydale with cranberry has 12% fewer calories (353 kcal vs 403 kcal).
- Wensleydale with cranberry has 27% less fat (24.4 g vs 33.6 g).
- Wensleydale with cranberry has 27% less saturated fat (15.3 g vs 21.1 g).
- Red Leicester Slices has 97% less sugar (0.5 g vs 14.3 g).
- Wensleydale with cranberry has 84% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.7 g).
- Red Leicester Slices has 26% more protein (25 g vs 18.5 g).
- Wensleydale with cranberry has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Red Leicester Slices
Red Leicester cheese, annatto norbixin
Wensleydale with cranberry
WENSLEYDALE CHEESE (83%) (Milk), SWEETENED DRIED CRANBERRIES (13%) (Sugar, Cranberries, Sunflower Oil), Fructose. ALLERGY ADVICE: For allergens, see ingredients in bold. DIETARY ADVICE: Suitable for vegetarians. NUTRITION: Typical values per 100g: Energy 1548kJ/
FAQ
Which is healthier: Red Leicester Slices or Wensleydale with cranberry?
Overall, Wensleydale with cranberry has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wensleydale with cranberry has fewer calories: 353 kcal versus 403 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Red Leicester Slices has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 14.3 g per 100 g.