Comparison
Red Leicester Slices vs Samson Kosher
Overall, Samson Kosher has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Red Leicester Slices | Samson Kosher |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 403 kcal | 375 kcal |
| Fat | 33.6 g | 32 g |
| Saturated fat | 21.1 g | 22 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Red Leicester Slices has 80% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.5 g).
- Samson Kosher has 64% less salt (0.6 g vs 1.7 g).
- Red Leicester Slices has 68% more protein (25 g vs 8 g).
- Samson Kosher has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Red Leicester Slices lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Red Leicester Slices
Red Leicester cheese, annatto norbixin
Samson Kosher
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Red Leicester Slices or Samson Kosher?
Overall, Samson Kosher has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Samson Kosher has fewer calories: 375 kcal versus 403 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Red Leicester Slices has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Mature vs Samson Kosher
Red Leicester Slices vs Wensleydale with cranber...
Wensleydale with cranber... vs Samson Kosher
Organic Rice Cake Minis... vs Red Leicester Slices
Organic Rice Cake Minis... vs Samson Kosher
Red Leicester Slices vs Somerset Brie
Somerset Brie vs Samson Kosher
Dried Sweetened Mango vs Red Leicester Slices