Comparison
Räucherlachs vs Forelle
Overall, Forelle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Räucherlachs | Forelle |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 180 kcal | 144 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 5.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Forelle has 20% fewer calories (144 kcal vs 180 kcal).
- Forelle has 49% less fat (5.6 g vs 11 g).
- Forelle has 35% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2 g).
- Forelle has 28% less salt (2.2 g vs 3.1 g).
- Forelle is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Räucherlachs
Lachs, Speisesalz, Zucker, Natriumlactat, Edelholzrauch
Forelle
Forelle, Speisesalz, Edelholzrauch
FAQ
Which is healthier: Räucherlachs or Forelle?
Overall, Forelle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Forelle has fewer calories: 144 kcal versus 180 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Räucherlachs has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Thunfisch-Filets ohne Öl vs Räucherlachs
Räucherlachs vs Alaska Seelachs Mus
Räucherlachs vs Dänische Regenbogen Fore...
Räucherlachs vs Norwegischer Räucher-Lac...
Räucherlachs vs Forellen-Filets
Räucherlachs vs Thunfisch mit Gemüse
Forelle vs Thunfisch mit Gemüse
Thunfisch-Filets ohne Öl vs Forelle