Räucherlachs vs Alaska Seelachs Mus
Overall, Räucherlachs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Räucherlachs | Alaska Seelachs Mus |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 180 kcal | 341 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 33 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 2.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 3.1 g | 8.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | — |
| Protein | 21 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Räucherlachs has 47% fewer calories (180 kcal vs 341 kcal).
- Räucherlachs has 67% less fat (11 g vs 33 g).
- Räucherlachs has 20% less saturated fat (2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Räucherlachs has no sugar, while Alaska Seelachs Mus has 0.5 g.
- Räucherlachs has 63% less salt (3.1 g vs 8.3 g).
- Räucherlachs has 43% more protein (21 g vs 12 g).
- Räucherlachs has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Räucherlachs
Lachs, Speisesalz, Zucker, Natriumlactat, Edelholzrauch
Alaska Seelachs Mus
68% Alaska gesalzen, getärbt |Lactsersatz] (Alaska Seelachsfilet, Salz, branntweinessig, Konservierunqsstoft: Natriumbenzoat Raucharoma, farbstoffe: Gelborange S und Cochenillerot A), Rapsol. Kann Spuren von Krebstieren, Eiern, Soja, Milch, Sellerie und Senf enthalten. belborange S und Cochenillerot A: Kann Aktivität und Aufmerksamkeit bei Kindern beeinträchtigen. Seelachs
FAQ
Which is healthier: Räucherlachs or Alaska Seelachs Mus?
Overall, Räucherlachs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Räucherlachs has fewer calories: 180 kcal versus 341 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Räucherlachs has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.