Comparison

RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* vs Ras el hanout mezcla de especias y aromas

Overall, Ras el hanout mezcla de especias y aromas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge...Ras el hanout mezcla de espe...
Nutri-Score a —
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 273 kcal 0 kcal
Fat 4.9 g 0 g
Saturated fat 2.5 g 0 g
Sugars 3.6 g 0 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 27.3 g —
Protein 7.5 g 0 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ras el hanout mezcla de especias y aromas has no calories, while RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* has 273 kcal.
  • Ras el hanout mezcla de especias y aromas has no fat, while RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* has 4.9 g.
  • Ras el hanout mezcla de especias y aromas has no saturated fat, while RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* has 2.5 g.
  • Ras el hanout mezcla de especias y aromas has no sugar, while RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* has 3.6 g.
  • RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* has 100% more protein (7.5 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g*

Curcuma, cannelle, clou de girofle, fenouil, muscade, poivre noir, gingembre, laurier, piment

Ras el hanout mezcla de especias y aromas

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: RAS EL HANOUT "éco recharge COOK" 35g* or Ras el hanout mezcla de especias y aromas?

Overall, Ras el hanout mezcla de especias y aromas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ras el hanout mezcla de especias y aromas has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 273 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ras el hanout mezcla de especias y aromas has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons