Rare roast beef vs Opa‘s Weißer
Overall, Rare roast beef has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rare roast beef | Opa‘s Weißer |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 134 kcal | 305 kcal |
| Fat | 2.1 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 7.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | — | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 28.6 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Beef, Mustard | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rare roast beef has 56% fewer calories (134 kcal vs 305 kcal).
- Rare roast beef has 92% less fat (2.1 g vs 26 g).
- Rare roast beef has 85% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 7.3 g).
- Rare roast beef has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Rare roast beef has 100% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0 g).
- Rare roast beef has 44% more protein (28.6 g vs 16 g).
- Rare roast beef is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Rare roast beef lists: Beef, Mustard.
Ingredients
Rare roast beef
Beef, salt, Dried Mustard
Opa‘s Weißer
93% Schweinefleisch, Trinkwasser, Nitritpökelsalz (Speisesalz Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit) Gewürze, Stabilisator: Diphosphate
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rare roast beef or Opa‘s Weißer?
Overall, Rare roast beef has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rare roast beef has fewer calories: 134 kcal versus 305 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rare roast beef has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.